Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enGlover, Chris; Brown, Evelyn
TitelWritten Feedback for Students: Too Much, Too Detailed or Too Incomprehensible to Be Effective?
QuelleIn: Bioscience Education e-Journal, 7 (2006), Artikel 3 (16 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1479-7860
SchlagwörterFeedback (Response); Formative Evaluation; Physical Sciences; Biological Sciences; Item Analysis; Instructional Effectiveness; Teacher Attitudes; Research Problems; Research Methodology; Foreign Countries; Interviews; Questionnaires; Focus Groups; Student Attitudes; United Kingdom (London)
AbstractA three year research study entitled "Improving the effectiveness of Formative Assessment in Science Teaching", involving Biosciences and Physical Sciences staff and students at two UK Universities, has been examining the potential for improving student learning by making changes to the way formative assessment and feedback are presented. Whilst initial findings from the research outline similarities and differences in perceptions of the two institutions (see Gibbs 2002; Gibbs, Simpson and Macdonald 2003), this paper focuses on the effectiveness of written feedback at both universities. The paper presents a more detailed analysis specifically of the perceptions of the levels and relative effectiveness of written feedback. Some key qualities of this feedback, and some examples of inappropriate use are identified, providing insights into possible changes in the nature of, and approach to written feedback to students. The research described in this paper was carried out by the Formative Assessment in Science Teaching (FAST) project during the period 2003-2006 and has formed the basis for a workshop organised by the Centre for Bioscience in London (26th Jan 2006) and again at Wolverhampton (22nd Feb 2006). The workshop focused on the categories of feedback given to students, including: noting of omissions and use of English, investigated the effectiveness of different types of written feedback, and asked "if a comment is made, what do you expect the student to do about it?" (Contains 3 figures and 1 footnote.) (As Provided).
AnmerkungenCentre for Bioscience, The Higher Education Academy. Room 9.15 Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. Tel: +44-113-343-3001; Fax: +44-113-343-5894; e-mail: beej@leeds.ac.uk; Web site: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2017/4/10
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Bioscience Education e-Journal" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: