Form-Meaning Mappings in the Aspectual Domain: What about the L1? A Response to Bruhn de Garavito and Valenzuela

Autor/in	Montrul, Silvina
Titel	Form-Meaning Mappings in the Aspectual Domain: What about the L1? A Response to Bruhn de Garavito and Valenzuela
Quelle	In: Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11 (2008) 3, S.337-339 (3 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1366-7289
DOI	10.1017/S1366728908003568
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Semantics; Syntax; Morphology (Languages); Linguistics; Monolingualism; Developmental Delays; Spanish; Second Language Instruction; Second Language Learning; Verbs; Language Teachers; Grammar; Bilingualism; Language Processing + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Semantik; Morphology; Morphologie; Linguistik; Entwicklungsverzögerung; Spanisch; Fremdsprachenunterricht; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Language teacher; Sprachunterricht; Grammatik; Bilingualismus; Sprachverarbeitung
Abstract	Any person who has taught Spanish as a second language or who has interacted with a non-native speaker of Spanish can easily tell that mastering the correct use of the copulas "ser" and "estar" is very difficult in both spoken and written production. But L2 learners are not alone. The Spanish copulas also present difficulty and frustration for L2 instructors of Spanish, since most pedagogical explanations of the uses of "ser" and "estar" provided in textbooks are incomplete and inaccurate. However, the acquisition of copular constructions has not received the attention it deserves in the acquisition literature, making a special issue of "Bilingualism: Language and Cognition" dedicated to this topic particularly welcome. A reason for the scarcity of research in this area may be related to both the linguistic complexity of Spanish "ser" and "estar" and the inadequacy of many available theoretical treatments to explain their complementary distribution. Although constructions with "ser" and "estar" are highly frequent in the input, they are grammatically quite intricate, straddling between the levels of morphology, syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Accordingly, Bruhn de Garavito and Valenzuela correctly frame their study within the current debate on interface vulnerability in language development in general, and in adult L2 acquisition in particular (Sorace, 2004; White, in press). In a nutshell, grammatical areas which require the integration of different levels of linguistic knowledge (e.g., syntax-discourse, syntax-morphology, morphology-semantics, etc.) for processing, production, or interpretation, show developmental delays and instability in monolingual and bilingual acquisition. In the case of monolingual acquisition, instability or non-target-like behavior is temporary, but in L2 grammars, instability can persist up to very advanced levels of proficiency, eventually leading to fossilization. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Cambridge University Press. The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8RU, UK. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Tel: +44-1223-326070; Fax: 845-353-4141; Fax: +44-1223-325150; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: http://www.cambridge.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10