Holding Therapy and Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy Are Not Supported and Acceptable Social Work Interventions: A Systematic Research Synthesis Revisited

Autor/inn/en	Pignotti, Monica; Mercer, Jean
Titel	Holding Therapy and Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy Are Not Supported and Acceptable Social Work Interventions: A Systematic Research Synthesis Revisited
Quelle	In: Research on Social Work Practice, 17 (2007) 4, S.513-519 (7 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1049-7315
DOI	10.1177/1049731506297046
Schlagwörter	Psychotherapy; Social Work; Foster Care; Developmental Psychology; Intervention; Reader Response; Misconceptions; Program Validation; Mental Health Programs; Outcomes of Treatment; Theory Practice Relationship; Evaluation Research + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Psychotherapie; Soziale Arbeit; Pflegehilfe; Entwicklungspsychologie; Leserbrief; Missverständnis; Theorie-Praxis-Beziehung; Evaluationsforschung
Abstract	This article re-examines material discussed in a recent systematic research synthesis by Craven and Lee. The authors find that two of the interventions for foster children discussed by Craven and Lee were erroneously classified as supported by evidence of efficacy, and one, holding therapy, is shown to be potentially physically harmful to children. Detailed evidence is offered to show that holding therapy and dyadic developmental psychotherapy are not appropriately categorized as supported and acceptable interventions. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10