What Is a Competent "Competence Standard"?: Tensions between the Construct and Assessment as a Tool for Learning

Autor/in	Mclellan, Effie
Titel	What Is a Competent "Competence Standard"?: Tensions between the Construct and Assessment as a Tool for Learning
Quelle	In: Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 15 (2007) 4, S.437-448 (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0968-4883
DOI	10.1108/09684880710829992
Schlagwörter	Formative Evaluation; Validity; Academic Standards; Higher Education; Foreign Countries; Colleges; Competence; Summative Evaluation; Academic Achievement + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Gültigkeit; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Ausland; College; Hochschule; Fachhochschule; Kompetenz; Schulleistung
Abstract	Purpose: Using the UK's recent disability legislation as a trigger, the paper explores issues in evidencing competence in the current context of using assessment as a tool for learning. Design/methodology/approach: A modified version of the pragmatic method is used, in which assessment theory is used to explore the tension in assessment which is both legislatively compliant and theoretically coherent. Findings: In the current context of requiring assessment to be edumetrically sound, the legislation of competence standards is problematic in four respects. Task validity is now a much more diffuse concept. Scoring validity has to contend with many possible accommodations. Assessment generalisability has to consider both the relevance and representativeness of the assessment task. Consequential validity is essentially concerned with formative assessment, which is considered pedagogically important but, politically, is of less significance than summative assessment. Research limitations/implications: The analysis here is in terms of legislation within the UK and therefore may not refer to nuances of difference in the anti-discrimination legislation in other jurisdictions. Practical implications: The study offers academics and administrators a framework within which to review the edumetric soundness of their assessment practices and policies. In so, doing possible difficulties in equitable assessment can be made explicit. This, in turn, has implications for staff development. Originality/value: The paper uses significant pedagogical theory to illuminate a legislative requirement and thereby contextualise difficulties in implementing equitable assessment. (Contains 1 table.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald. 875 Massachusetts Avenue 7th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139. Tel: 888-622-0075; Fax: 617-354-6875; e-mail: america@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10