Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | MacIntosh-Murray, Anu; Perrier, Laure; Davis, David |
---|---|
Titel | Research to Practice in "The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions": A Thematic Analysis of Volumes 1 through 24 |
Quelle | In: Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26 (2006) 3, S.230-243 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0894-1912 |
DOI | 10.1002/chp.76 |
Schlagwörter | Health Occupations; Continuing Education; Professional Continuing Education; Bibliometrics; Meta Analysis; Inferences; Theory Practice Relationship; Thematic Approach; Qualitative Research; Research and Development; Journal Articles |
Abstract | Introduction: Authors have stressed the importance of the broader contextual influences on practice improvement and learning and have expressed concern about gaps between research and practice. This implies a potential expansion of the knowledge base for continuing education in the health professions (CEHP) and an increased emphasis on research evidence for that knowledge. How has the content of "The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions" ("JCEHP") reflected those changes? What are the implications for CEHP practitioners? Methods: Based on all abstracts, tables of contents, and editorials, a thematic analysis was completed for volumes 1 through 24 of "JCEHP." All texts were downloaded into qualitative analysis software and coded. Main code categories included demographics of articles, concepts relating to CEHP as a discipline, knowledge translation and outcomes-oriented continuing education, and theories and frameworks. Key themes were identified. Results: Key themes include categories of topics included in "JCEHP" over the years, the increased prominence of research in "JCEHP," a dual research evidence-to-practice gap, the professionalization of continuing education providers, and interdisciplinarity and the links with broader frameworks that have been proposed for CEHP. Discussion: Two sets of research-to-practice gaps are portrayed in the journal: the gap between clinical research and practice and the gap between research and practice in CEHP. To close the first gap, authors have asserted that the second gap must be addressed, ensuring that CEHP practices themselves are evidence based, driven by theory-based research. This is a variation on prior debates regarding the need to define CEHP as a discipline, which uses the language of professionalization. The increased focus of continuing education on the contexts of health care providers' practices has multiplied the topics that are potentially relevant to CEHP practice. (Author). |
Anmerkungen | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Subscription Department, 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |