Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Luhmann, Christian C.; Ahn, Woo-kyoung |
|---|---|
| Titel | Postscript: Abandonment of Causal Power |
| Quelle | In: Psychological Review, 112 (2005) 3, S.692-693 (2 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0033-295X |
| Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Criticism; Reader Response; Generalization; Hypothesis Testing; Interrater Reliability; Value Judgment; Psychological Evaluation |
| Abstract | This paper comments on the response offered by Cheng and Novick to Luhmann and Ahn's initial comments on Cheng's and Cheng and Novick's previous articles. Cheng and Novick argue that people's willingness to generalize across contexts contradicts our hypothesis. They argue that previous studies demonstrate that participants generalize their estimates to novel contexts, but we disagree. None of the cited studies can determine if participants "based their judgments on causal power" or if participants instead computed a context-dependent estimate of causal strength. It remains an open question when and, perhaps more importantly, why reasoners are willing to generalize to novel contexts. (Author). |
| Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications. |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
