Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Burton, Richard F. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Multiple-Choice and True/False Tests: Myths and Misapprehensions |
| Quelle | In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (2005) 1, S.65-72 (8 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0260-2938 |
| Schlagwörter | Guessing (Tests); Multiple Choice Tests; Objective Tests; Test Reliability; Test Items; Scoring; Test Length; Higher Education; Item Response Theory |
| Abstract | Examiners seeking guidance on multiple-choice and true/false tests are likely to encounter various faulty or questionable ideas. Twelve of these are discussed in detail, having to do mainly with the effects on test reliability of test length, guessing and scoring method (i.e. number-right scoring or negative marking). Some misunderstandings could be based on evidence from tests that were badly written or administered, while others may have arisen through the misinterpretation of reliability coefficients. The usefulness of item response theory in the analysis of academic test items is briefly dismissed. (Author). |
| Anmerkungen | Customer Services for Taylor & Francis Group Journals, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420 (Toll Free); Fax: 215-625-8914. |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
