Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Good, Megan R. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Part 2: For the Sake of Educational Quality--Let's Minimize Bureaucracy and Maximize Impact |
| Quelle | In: Assessment Update, 35 (2023) 6, S.4-5 (2 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 1041-6099 |
| DOI | 10.1002/au.30368 |
| Schlagwörter | Administrative Organization; Educational Quality; Outcomes of Education; Student Evaluation; Accreditation (Institutions); Graduation Rate; College Students; College Faculty; Data Use; Evaluation Methods; Evaluation Problems; Evaluation Criteria |
| Abstract | This issue of "Assessment Update" presents a three part series on fixing assessments. In Part 1: "Assessment Standards are Broken," David Eubanks highlights the challenges with the assessment standards articulated by institutional accreditors. In this article, Part 2: Megan R. Good, discusses the opportunity costs faced and ideas for maximizing the impact of our work. Good notes, the energy devoted to assessment report management could be better spent elsewhere. One opportunity cost would be the ability to spend more time and focus on the "fun" parts of assessment (or the "collaborative" parts as Eubanks describes it). With this in mind, Good is advocating for more flexibility and freedom. Good concludes that the standards are broad enough to enable flexibility, but the profession must embrace this opportunity and hold this stance when they serve as peer reviewers. (ERIC). |
| Anmerkungen | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
