Investigating the Overlap and Predictive Validity between Criterion A and B in the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in DSM-5

Autor/inn/en	Martí Valls, Carla; Balazadeh, Kitty; Kajonius, Petri
Titel	Investigating the Overlap and Predictive Validity between Criterion A and B in the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in DSM-5
Quelle	In: International Journal of Testing, 23 (2023) 3, S.190-204 (15 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Martí Valls, Carla)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1530-5058
DOI	10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661
Schlagwörter	Personality Problems; Factor Analysis; Personality Traits; Guides; Personality Measures; Predictive Validity; Symptoms (Individual Disorders); Addictive Behavior; Drug Addiction; Correlation; Personality Assessment; Psychopathology; Screening Tests; Psychological Patterns; Personality Assessment Inventory + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Faktorenanalyse; Individual characteristics; Personality characteristic; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Handbuch; Leitfaden; Psychiatrische Symptomatik; Drug dependence; Drug consomption; Drogenabhängigkeit; Korrelation; Persönlichkeitsanalyse; Psychopathologie; Screening-Verfahren
Abstract	The Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) consists of level of personality functioning (Criterion A) and maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B). The brief scale versions of these are understudied, while often being used by clinicians and researchers. In this study, we wanted to investigate the overlap and predictive validity of Criterion A and B. Participants (N = 253) were measured on level of personality functioning (LPFS-BF) and maladaptive personality traits (PID-5-BF), as well as internalizing outcomes such existential meaninglessness (EMS) and externalizing outcomes such as substance and behavioral addictions (SSAB). Data analysis was conducted with principal component analysis (PCA) and regression analyses. The results showed over 50% overlap between the brief versions of Criterion A and B, while Criterion B slightly outperformed Criterion A in outcomes of EMS and SSAB. We discuss the potential redundancy and usefulness of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01