The 3 Tiers Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test for Primary Students' Science Misconception

Autor/inn/en	Laeli, Cos Ma'arif Hidayatul; Gunarhadi; Muzzazinah
Titel	The 3 Tiers Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test for Primary Students' Science Misconception
Quelle	In: Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13 (2023) 2, S.103-111 (9 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Laeli, Cos Ma'arif Hidayatul)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2146-0655
Schlagwörter	Multiple Choice Tests; Elementary School Students; Science Instruction; Misconceptions; Grade 4; Diagnostic Tests; Mathematics Tests; Test Items; Item Analysis; Scientific Concepts; Concept Formation; Foreign Countries; Indonesia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Multiple choice examinations; Multiple-choice tests, Multiple-choice examinations; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Missverständnis; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; Diagnostic test; Diagnostischer Test; Test content; Testaufgabe; Itemanalyse; Concept learning; Begriffsbildung; Ausland; Indonesien
Abstract	The goal of this study was to determine how the 3 Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test developed in primary students' scientific understanding. This research and development includes fundamental studies, model development, and model testing. 161 fourth-graders served as research subjects. Tests, surveys, and observations are all used to collect data. The Miles and Huberman interactive model was used to analyze qualitative data, and the paired sample t-test and N-Gain Score test were used to analyze quantitative data. The findings indicate that 3 Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test instrument has a V index of 0,80 and a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0,890, indicating that the instrument is valid. Thus, all test items are legitimate and dependable. The instrument was able to identify misconceptions regarding science learning in light material that fit the following profile based on the results of the trials: 28,7% of students do not grasp the idea of light sources; 43,3% have misunderstandings; 17,8% have incomplete comprehension with misconceptions; 20,2% have incomplete understanding without misconceptions; and 14,9% have complete understanding. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Pegem Academy Publishing and Educational Guidance Services TLC. Mesrutiyet Caddesi, No: 45, Ankara, Kizilay 06420, Turkey. e-mail: editor@pegegog.net; Web site: https://www.pegegog.net/index.php/pegegog
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01