Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Ima, Wa; Pattiasina, Johan; Sopacua, Jems |
---|---|
Titel | Model to Increase Motivation and Learning Outcomes in Learning History |
Quelle | In: Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17 (2023) 2, S.206-214 (9 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Ima, Wa) ORCID (Pattiasina, Johan) ORCID (Sopacua, Jems) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2089-9823 |
Schlagwörter | History Instruction; Learning Processes; Learning Motivation; Outcomes of Education; Models; Student Motivation; Differences; High School Students; Foreign Countries; Learning Strategies; Indonesia History lessons; Geschichtsunterricht; Learning process; Lernprozess; Motivation for studies; Lernmotivation; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Analogiemodell; Schulische Motivation; Unterscheiden; High school; High schools; Student; Students; Oberschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Ausland; Learning methode; Learning techniques; Lernmethode; Lernstrategie; Indonesien |
Abstract | Value clarification technique (VCT) and teaching and contextual learning (CTL) are learning models that are rarely compared in history learning. Hence, the purpose of this study was to find: (1) The differences in student learning outcomes using the VCT model and the CTL learning model; (2) Differences in student learning outcomes between the use of the VCT learning model and CTL learning model for students who have high learning motivation; (3) Differences in learning outcomes between the use of VCT and CTL learning models for students who have low learning motivation; and (4) The interaction effect between the use of learning models and students' learning motivation on learning outcomes. This study employed a quasi-experimental quantitative approach with a 2×2 factorial design. The data analysis technique used a two-way analysis of variance at a significance level ([alpha]) of 0.05. The population in this study was all students of class X of social science (IPS). The study's research showed that: (1) There were significant differences in learning outcomes between students who used the VCT and CTL learning models; (2) There were differences in learning outcomes between the used of the VCT and CTL learning models for students who have high learning motivation; (3) There were differences in learning outcomes between the used of the VCT and CTL learning models for students who have low learning motivation; and (4) The used of the VCT and CTL learning models for students with high learning motivation was associated with better learning outcomes. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia. e-mail: edulearn@uad.ac.id; Web site: http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |