Synthesis of Critical Thinking Research of Basic Education Level Students Using Meta-Analysis in Thailand during 2010 to 2021

Autor/inn/en	Boonsathirakul, Jittinun; Kerdsomboon, Chakree
Titel	Synthesis of Critical Thinking Research of Basic Education Level Students Using Meta-Analysis in Thailand during 2010 to 2021
Quelle	In: Educational Research and Reviews, 18 (2023) 1, S.1-8 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Schlagwörter	Critical Thinking; Educational Research; Meta Analysis; Foreign Countries; Inquiry; Active Learning; Problem Based Learning; Effect Size; High School Students; Junior High School Students; Cognitive Tests; Thailand; Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Kritisches Denken; Bildungsforschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Meta-analysis; Metaanalyse; Ausland; Aktives Lernen; Problem-based learning; Problemorientiertes Lernen; High school; High schools; Student; Students; Oberschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Junior High Schools; Sekundarstufe I; Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest
Abstract	An analysis of critical thinking research during 2010 to 2021 was conducted using effect size criteria; subsequently, a model was proposed for teaching and learning management that promoted critical thinking by students at the basic education level using the Thai digital collection data base. Based on a search of past research quality examination criteria were identified using a research quality check form. Out of 200 studies identified, 173 met all criteria that covered 34 universities across Thailand. The most frequently used concepts (38.7%) were from the Watson and Glaser study, followed by the Ennis and Mill man study (16.8%). For the 173 learning management models, the most effective learning management model involved inquiry-based learning (19.5%), followed by problem-based learning (7.2%). The effect size value of the inquiry-based learning was high (2.32). In addition, critical thinking encouraged students at the high school level (effect size 2.37) and elementary level (effect size 2.77), based on these high levels of effect size. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Academic Journals. e-mail: err@academic.journals.org; e-mail: service@academicjournals.org; Web site: http://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01