Self-Assessment Complements Peer Assessment for Undergraduate Students in an Academic Writing Task

Autor/inn/en	Cheong, Choo Mui; Luo, Na; Zhu, Xinhua; Lu, Qi; Wei, Wei
Titel	Self-Assessment Complements Peer Assessment for Undergraduate Students in an Academic Writing Task
Quelle	In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48 (2023) 1, S.135-148 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Cheong, Choo Mui) ORCID (Luo, Na) ORCID (Zhu, Xinhua) ORCID (Lu, Qi) ORCID (Wei, Wei)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0260-2938
DOI	10.1080/02602938.2022.2069225
Schlagwörter	Undergraduate Students; Academic Language; Writing Assignments; Self Evaluation (Individuals); Peer Evaluation; Foreign Countries; Student Attitudes; Revision (Written Composition); Hong Kong + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Academic; Language; Languages; Akademiker; Sprache; Wissenschaftssprache; Ausland; Schülerverhalten; Korrektur; Hongkong
Abstract	Self-assessment is believed to complement peer assessment in the classroom. However, whether, how and why this is done remains unclear. This study, by investigating the combined use of self and peer assessment for an academic writing task among a group of undergraduate students in Hong Kong, aims to shed light on how self-assessment complements peer assessment. Self-assessment is found to complement peer assessment in five ways: (1) it guides students to revise when peer assessment is lacking; (2) self-assessment effectively supplements peer assessment when the students had access to peer assessment; (3) even if a student has access to quality peer assessment, self-assessment complements peer assessment due to the different reflection involved in the two processes; (4) self-assessment can supplement peer assessment in terms of issues related to social-affective burdens for the latter; (5) self-assessment also complements peer assessment in that it benefits high and low-achieving students. Two problems surfaced. One is the students' antipathy against self-assessment despite their overall positive perception about peer assessment; the other is the inadequacy of combining self with peer assessment in fostering learning outcomes regardless that the combined use of self and peer assessment helped the students with revision considerably. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01