Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enGao, Zhikai; Erickson, Bradley; Xu, Yiqiao; Lynch, Collin; Heckman, Sarah; Barnes, Tiffany
TitelYou Asked, Now What? Modeling Students' Help-Seeking and Coding Actions from Request to Resolution
QuelleIn: Journal of Educational Data Mining, 14 (2022) 3, S.109-131 (23 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
ZusatzinformationORCID (Gao, Zhikai)
ORCID (Heckman, Sarah)
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
SchlagwörterComputer Science Education; Help Seeking; College Faculty; Teacher Role; College Students; Programming; Student Behavior; Incidence; Computer Mediated Communication; Online Courses; Failure; Testing
AbstractDemand for education in Computer Science has increased markedly in recent years. With increased demand has come to an increased need for student support, especially for courses with large programming projects. Instructors commonly provide online post forums or office hours to address this massive demand for help requests. Identifying what types of questions students are asking in those interactions and what triggers their help requests can in turn assist instructors in better managing limited help-providing resources. In this study, we aim to explore students' help-seeking actions from the two separate approaches we mentioned before and investigate their coding actions before help requests to understand better what motivates students to seek help in programming projects. We collected students' help request data and commit logs from two Fall offerings of a CS2 course. In our analysis, we first believe that different types of questions should be related to different behavioral patterns. Therefore, we first categorized students' help requests based on their content (e.g., Implementation, General Debugging, or Addressing Teaching Staff (TS) Test Failures). We found that General Debugging is the most frequently asked question. Then we analyzed how the popularity of each type of request changed over time. Our results suggest that implementation is more popular in the early stage of the project cycle, and it changes to General Debugging and Addressing TS Failures in the later stage. We also calculated the accuracy of students' commit frequency one hour before their help requests; the results show that before Implementation requests, the commit frequency is significantly lower, and before TS failure requests, the frequency is significantly higher. Moreover, we checked before any help request whether students changed their source code or test code. The results show implementation requests related to higher chances of source code changes and coverage questions related to more test code changes. Moreover, we use a Markov Chain model to show students' action sequences before, during, and after the requests. And finally, we explored students' progress after the office hours interaction and found that over half of the students improved the correctness of their code after 20 minutes of their office hours interaction addressing TS failures ends. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenInternational Educational Data Mining. e-mail: jedm.editor@gmail.com; Web site: https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2024/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: