Bottled vs Tap Water Perceptions, Choices and Recommendations in a US Midwest University Community

Autor/inn/en	Olagunju, Kehinde; Sante, Maya R.; Bracey, Georgia; Greenfield, Ben K.
Titel	Bottled vs Tap Water Perceptions, Choices and Recommendations in a US Midwest University Community
Quelle	In: International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24 (2023) 4, S.911-931 (21 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1467-6370
DOI	10.1108/IJSHE-01-2022-0007
Schlagwörter	College Students; College Faculty; College Administration; School Personnel; Water; Preferences; Water Quality; Blacks; African Americans; Undergraduate Students; Costs; Conservation (Environment); Information Dissemination; Attitude Change; Individual Characteristics; Sustainability; Illinois + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Collegestudent; Fakultät; College administrators; Hochschulverwaltung; Schulpersonal; Wasser; Wasserqualität; Black person; Schwarzer; Afroamerikaner; Cost; Kosten; Conservation; Environment; Konservierung; Bewahung; Umwelt; Informationsverbreitung; Attitudinal change; Einstellungsänderung; Personality characteristic; Personality traits; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Nachhaltigkeit
Abstract	Purpose: This study aims to determine preference and concerns regarding tap vs bottled water and recommendations to increase tap water use in a US Midwest university. The authors propose interventions to increase tap water use based on survey results. Design/methodology/approach: The authors conducted an online survey of the community of a regional comprehensive university in the St. Louis metro-east region (Illinois, USA). They analyzed 781 responses using mixed methods, and developed recommendations based on community-based social marketing principles. Findings: Black respondents reported higher bottled water use than White respondents. Undergraduate students reported higher bottled water use than faculty or staff. Most respondents were concerned about cost and environmental impact for bottled water and taste and water quality for tap water. Chemical and safety concerns were specific and location-focused for tap water only. Concerns were similar to Safe Drinking Water Act mandated public information, such as prior reports of lead (Pb) in campus drinking water. Tap water taste concerns may relate to proximity to the water treatment plant, resulting in high residual chlorine levels. To increase tap water use in this community, the authors recommend persuasive information campaigns, improvements to infrastructure and distribution that increase tap water convenience, more transparent public reporting on tap water lead levels, management of residual chlorine levels, and establishment of institutional norms favoring tap water over bottled water. Originality/value: The authors evaluate barriers to drinking tap water across multiple environmental and social systems. The methods used in this study combine mixed methods analysis and community-based social marketing. The findings integrate respondent demographics and concerns, local water quality, local and national contamination events, campus-specific sustainability initiatives and barriers, and national drinking water regulations. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emerald.com/insight
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01