Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of Assessment of Work Performance among Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities

Autor/inn/en	Davutoglu, Ceren; Temizkan, Ege; Özberk, Eren Halil; Aran, Orkun Tahir
Titel	Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of Assessment of Work Performance among Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities
Quelle	In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36 (2023) 2, S.281-288 (8 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Temizkan, Ege) ORCID (Özberk, Eren Halil)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1360-2322
DOI	10.1111/jar.13057
Schlagwörter	Turkish; Foreign Countries; Psychometrics; Evaluation; Performance; Employment; Mild Intellectual Disability; Validity; Reliability; Factor Analysis; Adults; Measurement Techniques; Measures (Individuals); Turkey + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Türkisch; Ausland; Psychometry; Psychometrie; Evaluierung; Achievement; Leistung; Dienstverhältnis; Gültigkeit; Reliabilität; Faktorenanalyse; Messtechnik; Messdaten; Türkei
Abstract	Background: Assessment of work performance (AWP) is a test for assessing work performance and can be utilised in matching person-work and applying effective interventions. It was aimed to adjust and to evaluate the validity and reliability of AWP in Turkish with individuals with mild intellectual disability (ID). Methods: The study was conducted with 243 individuals with mild ID. Of the 243 participants, data gathered from 105 individuals was used to conduct exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and remaining data (138 individuals) was used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency, construct validity, test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity and inter-rater reliability were analyzed. Results: The AWP showed average to good reliability for individuals with mild ID. The construct validity and internal consistency of the AWP were confirmed with satisfying results; test-retest reliability (ICC >0.92) and inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.90) were excellent for all domains. The EFA resulted three factors, explaining 66.46% variance; and CFA resulted average fit. Conclusion: AWP is valid and reliable for evaluating the working performances of individuals with mild ID. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01