Face Masks Impair Facial Emotion Recognition and Induce Specific Emotion Confusions

Autor/inn/en	Rinck, Mike; Primbs, Maximilian A.; Verpaalen, Iris A. M.; Bijlstra, Gijsbert
Titel	Face Masks Impair Facial Emotion Recognition and Induce Specific Emotion Confusions
Quelle	In: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7 (2022), Artikel 83 (15 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
DOI	10.1186/s41235-022-00430-5
Schlagwörter	Hygiene; Disease Control; Health Behavior; COVID-19; Pandemics; School Safety; Occupational Safety and Health; Nonverbal Communication; Emotional Response; Interpersonal Communication; Recognition (Psychology); Psychological Patterns; Human Body; Accuracy + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Health behaviour; Gesundheitsverhalten; Occupational safety; Arbeitssicherheit; Non-verbal communication; Nonverbale Kommunikation; Emotionales Verhalten; Interpersonale Kommunikation; Recognition; Wiedererkennen; Menschlicher Körper
Abstract	Face masks are now worn frequently to reduce the spreading of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Their health benefits are undisputable, but covering the lower half of one's face also makes it harder for others to recognize facial expressions of emotions. Three experiments were conducted to determine how strongly the recognition of different facial expressions is impaired by masks, and which emotions are confused with each other. In each experiment, participants had to recognize facial expressions of happiness, sadness, anger, surprise, fear, and disgust, as well as a neutral expression, displayed by male and female actors of the Radboud Faces Database. On half of the 168 trials, the lower part of the face was covered by a face mask. In all experiments, facial emotion recognition (FER) was about 20% worse for masked faces than for unmasked ones (68% correct vs. 88%). The impairment was largest for disgust, followed by fear, surprise, sadness, and happiness. It was not significant for anger and the neutral expression. As predicted, participants frequently confused emotions that share activation of the visible muscles in the upper half of the face. In addition, they displayed response biases in these confusions: They frequently misinterpreted disgust as anger, fear as surprise, and sadness as neutral, whereas the opposite confusions were less frequent. We conclude that face masks do indeed cause a marked impairment of FER and that a person perceived as angry, surprised, or neutral may actually be disgusted, fearful, or sad, respectively. This may lead to misunderstandings, confusions, and inadequate reactions by the perceivers. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01