Beginning with the End in Mind: Meaningful and Intentional Endings to Equitable Partnerships in Science Education

Autor/inn/en	Santos, Stephany; Scipio, Déana
Titel	Beginning with the End in Mind: Meaningful and Intentional Endings to Equitable Partnerships in Science Education
Quelle	In: Science Education, 106 (2022) 5, S.1214-1231 (18 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Scipio, Déana)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0036-8326
DOI	10.1002/sce.21752
Schlagwörter	Equal Education; Partnerships in Education; STEM Education; Organizational Objectives; Values; Goal Orientation; Educational Practices; Power Structure; Geographic Location; Time; Barriers; Sustainability; Social Justice; Science Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hochschulpartnerschaft; STEM; Business goal; Unternehmensziel; Wertbegriff; Zielorientierung; Zielvorstellung; Bildungspraxis; Zeit; Nachhaltigkeit; Soziale Gerechtigkeit; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung
Abstract	This paper is one of three sequential papers interrogating equity in partnerships (or partnering relationships [PRs]) in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. In this piece, we prioritize abundance framing and dignity-conferring work when engaging in partnerships with and for communities who have been historically marginalized. We propose a framework of seven drivers that define the directions and/or success of PRs: (1) mission, vision, or values; (2) goals or outcomes; (3) practices or processes; (4) power, privilege, or oppression; (5) communities and geography; (6) time and urgency; and (7) partners. This framework can be used to examine PRs at any phase of their existence to ensure equity-centered and dignity-conferring processes and outcomes. We discuss case studies that are common or specific challenges or frustrations that occur in nonequity-centered PRs. We frame these as six vexations: (1) sustainable PRs; (2) dignity-conferring PRs; (3) repetitive PRs; (4) political PRs; (5) "mission trip" PRs; (6) and deceptive PRs. We address these by using a data feminist lens (a perspective inspired by the book "Data Feminism" that centers on justice in defining and presenting outcomes), and future dreamings (a perspective that centers on potential ahead) to define our suggestions for designing intentional endings of partnerships. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01