The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance--Third Edition: Reliability and Validity of the Screener

Autor/inn/en	Huscroft-D'Angelo, Jacqueline; Wery, Jessica; Martin-Gutel, Jodie D.; Pierce, Corey; Loftin, Kara
Titel	The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance--Third Edition: Reliability and Validity of the Screener
Quelle	In: Assessment for Effective Intervention, 47 (2022) 3, S.137-146 (10 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Huscroft-D'Angelo, Jacqueline)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1534-5084
DOI	10.1177/15345084211030840
Schlagwörter	Emotional Disturbances; Test Reliability; Test Validity; Screening Tests; Psychometrics; Interrater Reliability; Behavior Problems; Child Behavior; Questionnaires; Norm Referenced Tests; Behavior Disorders; Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Gefühlsstörung; Testreliabilität; Testvalidität; Screening-Verfahren; Psychometry; Psychometrie; Interrater-Reliabilität; Fragebogen
Abstract	The Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance Screener--Third Edition (SAED-3) is a standardized, norm-referenced measure designed to identify school-age students at risk for emotional and behavioral problems. Four studies are reported to address the psychometric status of the SAED-3 Screener. Study 1 examined the internal consistency of the Screener using a sample of 1,430 students. Study 2 investigated the interrater reliability of the Screener results across 123 pairs of teachers who had worked with the student for at least 2 months. Study 3 assessed the extent to which the results from the Screener are consistent over time by examining test-retest reliability. Study 4 examined convergent validity by comparing the "Screener" to the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Across all studies, samples were drawn from populations of students included in the nationally representative normative sample. The averaged coefficient alpha for the "Screener" was 0.88. Interrater reliability coefficient for the composite was 0.83. Test-retest reliability of the composite was 0.83. Correlations with the SDQ subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.99, and the correlation of the "Screener" to the SDQ composite was 0.99. Limitations and implications for use of the "Screener" are discussed. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01