Between Two Fields: US Public Master's Institutions -- Striving for Prestige or Equity?

Autor/inn/en	Warshaw, Jarrett B.; McNaughtan, Jon; DeMonbrun, Matt
Titel	Between Two Fields: US Public Master's Institutions -- Striving for Prestige or Equity?
Quelle	In: Higher Education Policy, 34 (2021) 2, S.344-369 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Warshaw, Jarrett B.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0952-8733
DOI	10.1057/s41307-019-00137-1
Schlagwörter	Universities; Public Colleges; Masters Programs; Graduate Study; Institutional Characteristics; Reputation; Equal Education; Selective Admission; Enrollment Trends; Low Income Students; Out of State Students; Grants; Economic Factors; Social Stratification + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? University; Universität; Magister course; Magisterstudiengang; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Bildungsselektion; Grant; Finanzielle Beihilfe; Ökonomischer Faktor; Soziale Zusammensetzung
Abstract	Conventional wisdom suggests that a field of striving compels US public master's institutions (PMIs) to pursue prestige in the academic hierarchy. We posit that, due to their unique histories of democratizing college opportunity, PMIs face conflicting imperatives from two fields: an origin one of equity and another of striving. Our hypotheses are that the pursuit of prestige entails departing from an origin field and will widen stratification between and within institutions over time. Using longitudinal data on organizational characteristics and enrollment share of low-income students, descriptive results suggest a relatively stable position among PMIs and in serving students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Panel analyses offered here indicate that, all else equal, PMIs with higher admissions selectivity, more out-of-state students, higher institutional grant aid, stronger growth in graduate education, and more favorable state economic conditions enrolled fewer low-income students over time than did their peers. Yet marginal effects showed moderate changes rather than swings toward dramatically greater between- and within-institution stratification. We discuss implications for research on managing conflicting imperatives from multiple fields and for public policy that foregrounds and rewards equity. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Palgrave Macmillan. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail:customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: http://www.palgrave.com/us/social-science/education
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01