Decision-Making System for Higher Education University Selection: Comparison of Priorities Pre- and Post-COVID-19

Autor/inn/en	Nanath, Krishnadas; Sajjad, Ali; Kaitheri, Supriya
Titel	Decision-Making System for Higher Education University Selection: Comparison of Priorities Pre- and Post-COVID-19
Quelle	In: Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14 (2022) 1, S.347-365 (19 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Nanath, Krishnadas)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2050-7003
DOI	10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0277
Schlagwörter	Decision Making; College Choice; Universities; College Bound Students; COVID-19; Pandemics; Evaluation Criteria; Reputation; Electronic Learning; Student Experience; College Environment; Foreign Countries; United Arab Emirates + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Studienortwahl; University; Universität; Studienerfahrung; Hochschulumwelt; Ausland; Vereinigte Arabische Emirate
Abstract	Purpose: University selection in higher education is a complex task for aspirants from a decision-making perspective. This study first aims to understand the essential parameters that affect potential students' choice of higher education institutions. It then aims to explore how these parameters or priorities have changed given the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Learning about the differences in priorities for university selection pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic might help higher education institutions focus on relevant parameters in the post-pandemic era. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a mixed-method approach, with primary and secondary data (university parameters from the website and LinkedIn Insights). We developed a university selector system by scraping LinkedIn education data of various universities and their alumni records. The final decision-making tool was hosted on the web to collect potential students' responses (primary data). Response data were analyzed via a multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model. Portal-based data collection was conducted twice to understand the differences in university selection priorities pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic. A one-way MANOVA was performed to find the differences in priorities related to the university decision-making process pre- and post-COVID-19. Findings: This study considered eight parameters of the university selection process. MANOVA demonstrated a significant change in decision-making priorities of potential students between the pre- and post-COVID-19 phases. Four out of eight parameters showed significant differences in ranking and priority. Respondents made significant changes in their selection criteria on four parameters: cost (went high), ranking (went low), presence of e-learning mode (went high) and student life (went low). Originality/value: The current COVID-19 pandemic poses many uncertainties for educational institutions in terms of mode of delivery, student experience, campus life and others. The study sheds light on the differences in priorities resulting from the pandemic. It attempts to show how social priorities change over time and influence the choices students make. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emerald.com/insight
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01