Perspectives of People with Intellectual Disability about Their Family Networks: A Comparison Study with Key Support Worker Proxy Reports

Autor/inn/en	Tournier, Tess; Hendriks, Alexander H. C.; Jahoda, Andrew; Hastings, Richard P.; Giesbers, Sanne A. H.; Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
Titel	Perspectives of People with Intellectual Disability about Their Family Networks: A Comparison Study with Key Support Worker Proxy Reports
Quelle	In: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 47 (2022) 1, S.27-38 (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Tournier, Tess) ORCID (Hendriks, Alexander H. C.) ORCID (Jahoda, Andrew) ORCID (Hastings, Richard P.) ORCID (Giesbers, Sanne A. H.) ORCID (Embregts, Petri J. C. M.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1366-8250
DOI	10.3109/13668250.2020.1827143
Schlagwörter	Mild Intellectual Disability; Networks; Attitudes; Behavior Problems; Emotional Problems; Family Role; Family Relationship; Gender Differences; Place of Residence; Mental Health; Adults; Foreign Countries; Cognitive Ability; Caregivers; Netherlands; Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Attitude; Einstellung; Verhalten; Geschlechterkonflikt; Wohnort; Psychohygiene; Ausland; Denkfähigkeit; Caregiver; Carer; Betreuungsperson; Pfleger; Niederlande
Abstract	Background: The Family Network Method -- Intellectual Disability (FNM-ID) was used to compare perspectives of people with mild intellectual disability and their support workers on family networks of people with intellectual disability. Method: 138 participants with mild intellectual disability and support workers were interviewed, using the FNM-ID. Paired t-tests were used to examine differences in perspectives. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine divergence in perspectives. Results: People with mild intellectual disability perceived their family networks to be larger and to provide more support than support workers did. Living in a residential setting and having higher levels of externalising behaviour were associated with differences in perspectives, whereas a higher level of internalising behaviour was associated with more similar views. Conclusions: Individuals with intellectual disability and support workers are unlikely to provide the same information about family networks of people with mild intellectual disability. Behavioural and emotional problems were associated with divergence in perspectives. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01