Predictors of Uptake and Retention in an Intervention to Improve Social Reactions to Disclosures of Sexual Assault and Partner Abuse

Autor/inn/en	Waterman, Emily A.; Edwards, Katie M.; Rodriguez, Lindsey M.; Ullman, Sarah E.; Dardis, Christina M.
Titel	Predictors of Uptake and Retention in an Intervention to Improve Social Reactions to Disclosures of Sexual Assault and Partner Abuse
Quelle	In: Journal of American College Health, 70 (2022) 1, S.199-208 (10 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Waterman, Emily A.) ORCID (Edwards, Katie M.) ORCID (Dardis, Christina M.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0744-8481
DOI	10.1080/07448481.2020.1739054
Schlagwörter	Victims of Crime; Sexual Abuse; Intervention; Program Effectiveness; At Risk Students; Attendance; Persistence; Barriers; Incentives; Violence; Behavior Modification; Helping Relationship; Student Characteristics; Undergraduate Students; Coping + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Victim; Victims; Crime; Opfer; Verbrechen; Sexueller Missbrauch; Anwesenheit; Ausdauer; Anreiz; Gewalt; Behaviour modification; Verhaltensänderung; Helfende Beziehung; Bewältigung
Abstract	Objective: Examine uptake (e.g., initial session participation) and retention (e.g., booster session participation) in an intervention about responding to sexual assault and partner abuse disclosures. Participants: Participants were 836 students (primarily White; upper-middle class) at a medium-sized university. Method: Participants completed baseline surveys, were invited to a two-session intervention, and responded to a follow-up survey. Results: Initial session attendance was 36.2% (n = 303); of those, 83.1% (n = 252) attended the booster. Female, sexual minority students, and students with fewer prior negative reactions, and higher initial session satisfaction were more likely to attend than other students. Participants' reported reasons for not attending included scheduling problems and topic discomfort. Participants reported that remote attendance and higher cash incentives would have made attendance more likely. Conclusion: Findings indicate the draw of cash incentives, a need to reach high-risk students and integrate into existing organizations, and the potential for individualized prevention. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01