Comparing Different Interventions' Effects on Latinas' Screening Mammography Attainment and Participant-Driven Information Diffusion

Autor/inn/en	Molina, Yamilé; San Miguel, Liliana G.; Tamayo, Lizeth; Pichardo, Catherine; Torres, Paola; Robledo, Casandra; Diaz, Leslie; Ruiz, Izalia; Sánchez Díaz, Carola T.; Arroyo, Juanita; Medina, Maria; Coronado, Nora; Hernandez, Olivia; Lucio, Araceli; Fitzgibbon, Marian L.; Kroenke, Candyce H.
Titel	Comparing Different Interventions' Effects on Latinas' Screening Mammography Attainment and Participant-Driven Information Diffusion
Quelle	In: Health Education & Behavior, 48 (2021) 6, S.818-830 (13 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Molina, Yamilé) ORCID (Tamayo, Lizeth)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1090-1981
DOI	10.1177/10901981211010448
Schlagwörter	Screening Tests; Cancer; Females; Hispanic Americans; Intervention; Program Effectiveness; Health Behavior; Educational Methods; Age Differences; Health Insurance; Intention; Empowerment; Individual Characteristics; Social Networks; Illinois (Chicago) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Screening-Verfahren; Carcinoma; Karzinom; Krebs (med); Krebserkrankung; Weibliches Geschlecht; Hispanic; Hispanoamerikaner; Health behaviour; Gesundheitsverhalten; Educational method; Erziehungsmethode; Age; Difference; Age difference; Altersunterschied; Krankenversicherung; Personality characteristic; Personality traits; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Social network; Soziales Netzwerk
Abstract	Evaluation of multiple community-based approaches to improve Latinas' breast cancer (BC) screening utilization has resulted in inconsistent findings. Factors contributing to this variation include heterogeneity in approaches (e.g., types of conceptual frameworks) and study quality (e.g., lack of measurement of spillover effects). This pilot study sought to clarify which approach may be most effective by evaluating the relative efficacy of two conceptual approaches using an area-level design with 145 Latinas nonadherent to U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) BC screening guidelines. Each study arm included identical intervention format and duration (e.g., three group-based sessions, logistic assistance (LA) via five monthly calls and referral to free/low-cost screening programs). However, study content differed. While educate+LA addressed participants' BC prevention and screening behavior, empower+LA addressed participants' and their social networks' BC screening. After adjusting for age, insurance status, and baseline mammography intention, when compared with educate+LA participants, empower+LA participants were more likely to report obtaining mammograms, engaging more individuals about BC, initiating BC conversations in public settings, and discussing mammography specifically. Our study has important implications regarding the utility of evaluating behavioral interventions overall in terms of behavioral and spillover network effects. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01