Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Chrobak, Quin M.; Braun, Blair E.; Smith, Allison L.; Zaragoza, Maria S. |
---|---|
Titel | Can Clarifying Instructions Mitigate the Effects of Multifaceted Questions on Susceptibility to Suggestion? |
Quelle | In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35 (2021) 6, S.1502-1509 (8 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Chrobak, Quin M.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0888-4080 |
DOI | 10.1002/acp.3883 |
Schlagwörter | Questioning Techniques; Instruction; Difficulty Level; Accuracy |
Abstract | When cross-examining witnesses, lawyers will sometimes use complex questions to "trip-up" witnesses and thus cast doubt on their testimony. Extending prior research, the present study showed that multifaceted test questions (which contain both a true and false proposition) reduced accuracy for both misled and control participants but had a disproportionate impact on the former. Although misled participants accurately rejected blatant suggestions when tested with simple questions, there was a two-fold increase in false assents when multifaceted questions were used (Experiment 1). Providing participants with explicit instructions on how to respond to multifaceted questions (i.e., respond "yes" only if all parts of the question are true) improved accuracy slightly but did not mitigate the magnitude of the misinformation effect (Experiment 2). Collectively, the results underscore the importance of assessing eyewitness suggestibility in contexts that mimic those witnesses are likely to encounter in the real world. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |