Registered Report: The Effects of Incentivized Lies on Memory

Autor/inn/en	Riesthuis, Paul; Otgaar, Henry; Hope, Lorraine; Mangiulli, Ivan
Titel	Registered Report: The Effects of Incentivized Lies on Memory
Quelle	In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35 (2021) 4, S.1125-1132 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Riesthuis, Paul) ORCID (Otgaar, Henry) ORCID (Hope, Lorraine) ORCID (Mangiulli, Ivan)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0888-4080
DOI	10.1002/acp.3838
Schlagwörter	Incentives; Deception; Cheating; Memory; Correlation; Experiments + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Anreiz; Täuschung; Prellen; Gedächtnis; Korrelation; Erprobung
Abstract	The proposed experiment will examine the effect of deceptive behavior on memory. Participants will be assigned to a "strong-incentive to cheat" or "weak-incentive to cheat" condition and play the adapted Sequential Dyadic Die-Rolling paradigm. Specifically, Player A (computer; participants think it is another participant) throws a die and reports it to Player B (participant). Then Player B throws his/her die, remembers the outcome, and reports it to Player A. Participants in the "strong-incentive to cheat" condition are monetarily punished if their die roll outcome differs from Player A's die roll outcome. Participants in the "weak-incentive to cheat" condition are not punished if the die roll outcomes differ. Two-days later, memory for the die-rolling event will be assessed. We predict that participants in the "strong-incentive to cheat" condition will have lower belief and recollection for the die-rolling event and will report more errors than participants in the "weak-incentive to cheat" condition. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01