Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Nosofsky, Robert M.; Cao, Rui; Harding, Samuel M.; Shiffrin, Richard M. |
---|---|
Titel | Modeling Short- and Long-Term Memory Contributions to Recent Event Recognition |
Quelle | In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47 (2021) 2, S.316-342 (27 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Nosofsky, Robert M.) ORCID (Cao, Rui) ORCID (Harding, Samuel M.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0278-7393 |
DOI | 10.1037/xlm0000812 |
Schlagwörter | Long Term Memory; Short Term Memory; Recognition (Psychology); Cognitive Mapping; Models; Pictorial Stimuli; Experiments; Task Analysis; Familiarity; Item Response Theory |
Abstract | Participants gave recognition judgments for short lists of pictures of everyday objects. Pictures in a given list were an equal mixture of three types that varied according to the way they were used as targets and foils earlier in the same session. Under consistent-mapping (CM), targets and foils never switch roles; under varied-mapping (VM), targets and foils switch roles randomly across trials; whereas all-new (AN) items are novel on each trial of the experiment. Past research has shown that markedly enhanced performance occurs in CM conditions, leading to conclusions that item-response learning takes place in CM, perhaps automatically. However, almost all past research has compared CM, VM, and AN performance in between-blocks designs in which participants may adopt different cognitive strategies and criterion settings across the conditions. The present mixed-list design holds constant the strategy and criterion settings that are used for CM, VM, and AN items, and produced patterns of performance dramatically different than those observed in pure-list control conditions. We develop an extended version of an exemplar-based random-walk model of probe recognition to account for the major qualitative effects in the data. The data and the modeling provide evidence for strong item-response learning for CM foils but weak item-response learning for CM targets. We consider possible explanations for these effects in our General Discussion. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |