Comparing Accelerometer and Self-Reported Treatment Effects in a Technology-Supported Physical Activity Intervention

Autor/inn/en	Welch, Whitney A.; Groth, Caroline P.; Phillips, Siobhan M.; Spring, Bonnie; Siddique, Juned
Titel	Comparing Accelerometer and Self-Reported Treatment Effects in a Technology-Supported Physical Activity Intervention
Quelle	In: Health Education & Behavior, 48 (2021) 1, S.34-41 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Welch, Whitney A.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1090-1981
DOI	10.1177/1090198120971194
Schlagwörter	Measurement Equipment; Measurement Techniques; Intervention; Outcomes of Treatment; Physical Activities; Physical Activity Level; Health Behavior; Eating Habits; Adults; Program Effectiveness; Handheld Devices; Data Collection + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Messinstrument; Messtechnik; Health behaviour; Gesundheitsverhalten; Ernährungsgewohnheit; Essgewohnheit; Data capture; Datensammlung
Abstract	Background and Aims: To estimate and compare the change in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) between an accelerometer and technology-supported physical activity (PA) log across a 3-week PA intervention. Method: Participants (N = 204, 77% female, age = 33 ± 11 years, body mass index = 28.2 ± 7.1 kg/m[superscript 2]) were randomized to one of two activity-related intervention arms--(1) increase MVPA intervention or (2) decrease sedentary behavior active control. Participants wore an accelerometer while simultaneously completing a technology-based PA log every day for 5 weeks: a 2-week baseline assessment phase and a 3-week intervention phase. Bivariate linear mixed-effects models and correlations were used to characterize the relationship of MVPA between measurement methods throughout the intervention. Effect sizes were calculated to determine the intervention effect by measurement method. Results: At baseline, PA log MVPA was 28 minutes greater than accelerometer-based minutes of MVPA in the active control group. This difference was 35 minutes (95% CI [23.7, 46.1]) greater at follow-up than at baseline measurement in the MVPA intervention group. In the active control group, there was a significant 16-minute (95% CI [6.0, 26.5]) increase between the two measures from baseline to follow-up. The intervention effect size based on the PA log was 0.27 (95% CI [0.14, 0.39]) and 0.42 (95% CI [0.28, 0.56]) when using the accelerometer. Discussion and Conclusions: Our results indicate that PA log MVPA and accelerometer MVPA estimate significantly different minutes per day of MVPA. It is important researchers use caution when comparing MVPA intervention outcomes from different measurement methods. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01