Functional Resistance Training Superiority over Conventional Training in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Autor/inn/en	Turri-Silva, Natália; Ricci-Vitor, Ana Laura; Cipriano, Gerson, Jr.; Garner, David; Netto, Jaime, Jr.; Giacon, Thaís; Destro Christofaro, Diego Giulliano; Marques Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos
Titel	Functional Resistance Training Superiority over Conventional Training in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Quelle	In: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 91 (2020) 3, S.415-424 (10 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Turri-Silva, Natália) ORCID (Ricci-Vitor, Ana Laura) ORCID (Cipriano, Gerson, Jr.) ORCID (Garner, David) ORCID (Giacon, Thaís) ORCID (Destro Christofaro, Diego Giulliano) ORCID (Marques Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0270-1367
DOI	10.1080/02701367.2019.1679333
Schlagwörter	Comparative Analysis; Metabolism; Training Methods; Physical Activities; Fatigue (Biology); Muscular Strength; Pain; Physiology; Patients; Matched Groups; Tests; Intervention; Outcomes of Treatment; Diseases; Measurement; Foreign Countries; Brazil + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Stoffwechsel; Didaktik; Trainingsmaßnahme; Fatigue; Ermüdung; Muskelkraft; Schmerz; Physiologie; Patient; Examination; Prüfung; Examen; Disease; Krankheit; Messverfahren; Ausland; Brasilien
Abstract	Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a growing epidemic related with higher values of blood pressure (BP) and autonomic dysfunction. Scientific evidence has been indicating that functional resistance training (FRT) is superior over conventional (CRT) for muscle fatigue and pain, yet its effects on autonomic modulation (AM), BP and heart rate in MetS are unclear. We theorized that FRT can be superior to CRT in MetS patients because of larger muscle activation. This study compares FRT and CRT on AM, blood pressure, heart rate and muscle strength. Thirty-eight sex and age matched individuals (40 to 60 years) were randomized for FRT or CRT, with training intensity varying gradually from 30%-100% of one maximal repetition test (1MR), 3 times/week for 30 sessions. All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and post training. AM was assessed by heart rate variability (mean RR, RMSSD, SDNN, LF, HF, TINN, RRtri, SD1 and SD2). BP (mmHg) was obtained by cuff measures. Muscle strength was assessed by 1MR. An increase in cardiac parasympathetic activity was observed in individuals allocated to FRT in comparison to CRT group (RMSSD [delta]40%; SD1 [delta]39%; and HF [subscript ms][superscript 2] [delta]80%). Moreover, just FRT was capable of reducing BP post intervention (SBP from 129.21 ± 19.02 to 118.94 ± 14.14 mmHg, p < 0.009,/d/ = 0.49; DBP from 85.26 ± 11.48 to 77.76 ± 8.93 mmHg, p < 0.01,/d/ = 0.51). Both groups had a similar increase in muscle strength and no changes between HR. Progressive FRT was more beneficial to CRT regarding AM, increasing vagal activity, and reducing blood pressure in MetS individuals. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01