Can Video Technology Improve Teacher Evaluations? An Experimental Study

Autor/inn/en	Kane, Thomas J.; Blazar, David; Gehlbach, Hunter; Greenberg, Miriam; Quinn, David M.; Thal, Daniel
Titel	Can Video Technology Improve Teacher Evaluations? An Experimental Study
Quelle	In: Education Finance and Policy, 15 (2020) 3, S.397-427 (31 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1557-3060
Schlagwörter	Video Technology; Teacher Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Persistence; Academic Achievement; Student Experience; Feedback (Response); Principals; Administrator Attitudes; Administrator Characteristics; Teacher Characteristics; Student Characteristics; Delaware; Georgia; Colorado; California + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Teacher appraisal; Lehrerbeurteilung; Lehrerverhalten; Schulleistung; Studienerfahrung; Principal; Schulleiter; Kalifornien
Abstract	Teacher evaluation reform has been among the most controversial education reforms in recent years. It also is one of the costliest in terms of the time teachers and principals must spend on classroom observations. We conducted a randomized field trial at four sites to evaluate whether substituting teacher-collected videos for in-person observations could improve the value of teacher observations for teachers, administrators, or students. Relative to teachers in the control group who participated in standard in-person observations, teachers in the video-based treatment group reported that post-observation meetings were more "supportive" and they were more able to identify a specific practice they changed afterward. Treatment principals were able to shift their observation work to noninstructional times. The program also substantially increased teacher retention. Nevertheless, the intervention did not improve students' academic achievement or self-reported classroom experiences, either in the year of the intervention or for the next cohort of students. Following from the literature on observation and feedback cycles in low-stakes settings, we hypothesize that to improve student outcomes schools may need to pair video feedback with more specific supports for desired changes in practice. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	MIT Press. 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. Tel: 617-253-2889; Fax: 617-253-1709; e-mail: journals-rights@mit.edu; Web site: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/edfp
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01