Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Mulligan, Neil W.; Buchin, Zachary L.; West, John T. |
---|---|
Titel | Assessing Why the Testing Effect Is Moderated by Experimental Design |
Quelle | In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46 (2020) 7, S.1293-1308 (16 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Buchin, Zachary L.) ORCID (West, John T.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0278-7393 |
DOI | 10.1037/xlm0000787 |
Schlagwörter | Testing; Research Design; Recall (Psychology); Memory; Effect Size; Word Lists; Cues; Undergraduate Students; Experimental Psychology; North Carolina |
Abstract | The testing effect is 1 of several memory effects moderated by experimental design, such that the effect on free recall is larger in a mixed-list than pure-list design (Mulligan, Susser, & Smith, 2016). The current experiments assess hypotheses regarding why this pattern is found. Three extant accounts of design effects (Nguyen & McDaniel, 2015) are the item-order account, the retrieval-distinctiveness account, and the rehearsal-borrowing account. Three experiments contrasted these accounts, finding support for rehearsal borrowing but no evidence for the rehearsal-distinctiveness or item-order accounts. In addition, each experiment found that the testing effect was larger in the mixed-list than pure-list condition, attesting to the replicability of the design-moderation pattern for the testing effect. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |