Discursive Conflicts in News Media and the Suspension of a Government-Led Test of English in Korea

Autor/inn/en	Shin, Dongil; Cho, Eunhae
Titel	Discursive Conflicts in News Media and the Suspension of a Government-Led Test of English in Korea
Quelle	In: Language Testing in Asia, 10 (2020), Artikel 5 (18 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Shin, Dongil) ORCID (Cho, Eunhae)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2229-0443
DOI	10.1186/s40468-020-00100-7
Schlagwörter	Language Tests; Newspapers; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Foreign Countries; Discourse Analysis; News Reporting; Competition; Conflict; Neoliberalism; Test Use; High Stakes Tests; Compliance (Psychology); Private Education; Government School Relationship; South Korea; Test of English as a Foreign Language + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Language test; Sprachtest; Newspaper; Zeitung; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Ausland; Diskursanalyse; News report; Reportage; Wettkampf; Konflikt; Neo-liberalism; Neoliberalismus; Testanwendung; Privatunterricht; Korea; Republik
Abstract	Drawing on critical discourse analysis methodologies, this study examines the discursive conflicts and strategies employed by newspaper media surrounding the National English Ability Test (NEAT) in Korea. NEAT was reported to cause severe competition among young learners of English and lacked public support. Discursive conflicts over whether NEAT would be legitimized flourished in the media. In this study, the discursive practices adopted by both proponents and opponents of NEAT in two leading Korean newspapers of different political orientations--"Chosun Ilbo" and "Hankyoreh"--were analyzed from 2006 to 2016. Over this decade, there were three periods of transformation: creation, expansion, and extinction. During the creation period, the discursive conflict focused on the TOEFL crisis in Korea, expansion on the implementation of NEAT, and extinction on its abolition. From creation to abolition, there were competing rationales for developing, suspending, or abolishing NEAT. This study investigated the underlying orientations (neoliberal and evaluative state) of the two newspapers and found that they examined the pros and cons of using the test. Moreover, the government's implementation of high-stakes testing and its attempt to reward those who complied and to curb the private education sector stresses market-friendly state interaction, which accordingly perpetuates neoliberal conditions. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01