A Distinction between Linguistic and Social Pragmatics Helps the Precise Characterization of Pragmatic Challenges in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Developmental Language Disorder

Autor/inn/en	Andrés-Roqueta, Clara; Katsos, Napoleon
Titel	A Distinction between Linguistic and Social Pragmatics Helps the Precise Characterization of Pragmatic Challenges in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Developmental Language Disorder
Quelle	In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63 (2020) 5, S.1494-1508 (15 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1092-4388
Schlagwörter	Children; Spanish Speaking; Autism; Pervasive Developmental Disorders; Pragmatics; Language Skills; Language Impairments; Theory of Mind; Developmental Disabilities + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Child; Kind; Kinder; Autismus; Pragmalinguistik; Language skill; Sprachkompetenz; Speech disorder; Speech disorders; Speech disabilities; Speech disability; Speech handicap; Speech handicaps; Speech impairment; Speech impairments; Language handicaps; Sprachbehinderung; Entwicklungsstörung
Abstract	Purpose: Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and children with developmental language disorder (DLD) face challenges with pragmatics, but the nature and sources of these difficulties are not fully understood yet. The purpose of this study was to compare the competence of children with ASD and children with DLD in two pragmatics tasks that place different demands on theory of mind (ToM) and structural language. Method: Twenty Spanish-speaking children with ASD, 20 with DLD, and 40 age- and language-matched children with neurotypical development were assessed using two pragmatics tasks: a linguistic pragmatics task, which requires competence with structural language, and a social pragmatics task, which requires competence with ToM as well. Results: For linguistic pragmatics, the ASD group performed similarly to the DLD and language-matched groups, and performance was predicted by structural language. For social pragmatics, the ASD group performed lower than the DLD and language-matched groups, and performance was predicted both by structural language and ToM. Conclusions: Children with ASD and children with DLD face difficulties in linguistic pragmatics tasks, in keeping with their structural language. Children with ASD face exceptional difficulties with social pragmatics tasks, due to their difficulties with ToM. The distinction between linguistic and social pragmatic competences can inform assessment and intervention for pragmatic difficulties in different populations. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01