Children's Response Bias and Identification of Misarticulated Words

Autor/inn/en	Krueger, Breanna I.; Storkel, Holly L.
Titel	Children's Response Bias and Identification of Misarticulated Words
Quelle	In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63 (2020) 1, S.259-273 (15 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1092-4388
Schlagwörter	Preschool Children; Articulation (Speech); Word Recognition; Responses; Bias; Accuracy; Auditory Stimuli; Visual Stimuli; Context Effect; Intelligence Tests; Verbal Ability; Vocabulary; Kansas; Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Pre-school age; Preschool age; Child; Children; Pre-school education; Preschool education; Vorschulalter; Kind; Kinder; Vorschulkind; Vorschulkinder; Vorschulerziehung; Vorschule; Worterkennung; Auditive Stimulation; Intelligence test; Intelligenztest; Mündliche Leistung; Wortschatz
Abstract	Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine whether children's identification of misarticulated words as real objects was influenced by an inherent bias toward selecting real objects or whether a change in experimental conditions could impact children's selections. Method: Forty preschool children aged 4 years 0 months to 6 years 11 months across 2 experiments heard accurate productions of real words (e.g., "leaf"), misarticulated words (e.g., "weaf" and "yeaf"), and unrelated nonwords (e.g., "geem"). Within the misarticulated words, the commonness of the substitute was controlled to be "common" or "uncommon." Using the MouseTracker software, children were asked to select between a real object (e.g., a leaf) and a novel object (Experiment 1) or between a real object (e.g., a leaf) and a blank square, which represented a hidden object (Experiment 2). Results: Consistent with previous findings, children chose real objects significantly more when they heard accurate productions (e.g., "leaf") than misarticulated productions (e.g., "weaf" or "yeaf") across both experiments. In misarticulation conditions, real object selections were lower than in the previous study; however, children chose real objects significantly more in the common misarticulation condition than in the uncommon misarticulation condition. Conclusions: The results of this study are consistent with previous findings. Children's behavioral responses depended upon the task. Despite these differences in the task, children demonstrated ease in integrating variability into their word identification. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01