Institutional Review Boards in Qualitative Research: Has It Gone Overboard?

Autor/in	Maxwell, Bruce R.
Titel	Institutional Review Boards in Qualitative Research: Has It Gone Overboard?
Quelle	In: Canadian Journal of Action Research, 20 (2019) 1, S.52-70 (19 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1925-7147
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Evaluators; Action Research; Qualitative Research; Universities; Ethics; Ethnography; Autobiographies; Research Proposals; Canada + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Projektforschung; Qualitative Forschung; University; Universität; Ethik; Ethnografie; Autobiography; Autobiografie; Autobiographie; Forschungsgegenstand; Kanada
Abstract	Canadian University Institutional Review Boards (IRB) assess action research proposals based on the ethical protection of participants, the methodology, and any potential implications for human participants involved in the qualitative study. There are more disadvantages than advantages through this ethical review process.This positional paper analyzes complex issues including: the implications that are intertwined with ethics in qualitative action research with human participants when assessed by IRBs; the challenges associated with autoethnography in terms of whether IRBs can ethically assess research proposals properly; and recommendations for the future review of qualitative action research within Canadian universities. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Canadian Association for Action Research in Education. 260 Dalhousie Street Suite 204, Ottawa, ON KIN 7E4, Canada. Tel: 705-474-3450; Fax: 705-474-1947; e-mail: cjar@nipissingu.ca; Web site: http://journals.nipissingu.ca/index.php/cjar/issue/archive
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01