Hearing and Deaf and Hard of Hearing: A Comparison on Metacognition, the Mooney Problem Checklist, IQ, and Gender

Autor/in	Al-Hilawani, Yasser A.
Titel	Hearing and Deaf and Hard of Hearing: A Comparison on Metacognition, the Mooney Problem Checklist, IQ, and Gender
Quelle	In: Volta Review, 116 (2017) 1-2, S.5-28 (23 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0042-8639
Schlagwörter	Hearing Impairments; Deafness; Metacognition; Intelligence Quotient; Gender Differences; Correlation; Self Concept; Quality of Life; Reaction Time; Foreign Countries; Intelligence Tests; Adolescents; Young Adults; Kuwait; Raven Progressive Matrices + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hearing impairment; Hörbehinderung; Gehörlosigkeit; Taubstummheit; Meta cognitive ability; Meta-cognition; Metakognitive Fähigkeit; Metakognition; Intelligenzquotient; Geschlechterkonflikt; Korrelation; Selbstkonzept; Lebensqualität; Reaktionsvermögen; Ausland; Intelligence test; Intelligenztest; Adolescent; Adolescence; Adoleszenz; Jugend; Jugendalter; Jugendlicher; Young adult; Junger Erwachsener
Abstract	The relationship between IQ, metacognition, and self-perception of quality of life as measured by the Mooney checklist was explored. Participants who were hearing and deaf and hard of hearing (D/HH) were compared using these outcome variables, with gender as an additional grouping variable. Results revealed performances on these measures were significantly correlated. There were significant differences on the Mooney measure in favor of the D/HH group (i.e., participants with hearing loss reported significantly less problems and concerns when compared with participants who had typical hearing). Analyses showed no significant differences between males and females in both groups on the metacognitive test, but males took more time and obtained a lower metacognitive score divided by time compared to females; and males showed no significant differences on the metacognitive test in reaction time, or on the metacognitive test scores divided by time. Results showed females with typical hearing performed significantly better on the three dependent variables derived from the metacognitive instrument. Limitations and suggestions for future research were discussed. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. 3417 Volta Place NW, Washington, DC 20007. Tel: 202-337-5220; Fax: 202-337-8314; e-mail: periodicals@agbell.org; Web site: http://www.agbell.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01