Causal Thinking for Embedded, Integrated Implementation Research

Autor/inn/en	Kainz, Kirsten; Metz, Allison
Titel	Causal Thinking for Embedded, Integrated Implementation Research
Quelle	In: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 15 (2019) 1, S.125-141 (17 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1744-2648
Schlagwörter	Logical Thinking; Evidence Based Practice; Knowledge Level; Intervention; Research Methodology + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Wissensbasis; Research method; Forschungsmethode
Abstract	Despite increasing use of implementation frameworks, research evidence indicates that the uptake of evidence-based practice is minimally realised. Reasons for the lack of up-take may be: 1) lack of fit between evidence-based interventions and local contexts; 2) lack of knowledge of how and when to adapt an evidence-based intervention to promote effective practice in local contexts; and 3) a frequently used implementation research agenda that limits new insights to achieve effective practice. In response to these concerns we propose an embedded, integrated research agenda motivated with causal thinking for knowledge of when and how to adapt interventions and implementation to achieve effective practice. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01