What Is the Aim of Discussion? A Provisional Answer with the Help of Habermas and Arendt

Autor/in	Vasterling, Veronica
Titel	What Is the Aim of Discussion? A Provisional Answer with the Help of Habermas and Arendt
Quelle	In: Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 18 (2019) 1, S.8-21 (14 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1474-0222
DOI	10.1177/1474022216629124
Schlagwörter	Verbal Communication; Persuasive Discourse; Attitudes; Logical Thinking; Comprehension; Philosophy; Participation; Validity; Deception; Perspective Taking; Holistic Approach; Discussion (Teaching Technique); Lecture Method; Seminars + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Persuasion; Persuasive Kommunikation; Attitude; Einstellung; Verhalten; Verstehen; Verständnis; Philosophie; Teilnahme; Gültigkeit; Täuschung; Zukunftsperspektive; Holistischer Ansatz; Seminar
Abstract	Habermas and Arendt defend two contrasting accounts of discussion. While both accounts acknowledge the importance of knowledge as basis of discussion, Habermas emphasizes the aim of reasoned agreement and Arendt focuses on plural interpretative perspectives. I will explore the tension between the two accounts in order to clarify the phenomenon of discussion. In particular, I want to address the question whether the two accounts are incompatible or, rather, focus on different stages or practices of discussion that can be folded into each other. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01