A Development of Systematic Learning Resources Management Process to Strengthen Sufficiency Attributes of Secondary School Students

Autor/inn/en	Kangpheng, Samrit; Kunlong, Sarayuth; Mityodwong, Supot; Sirikul, Peerapet; Buddeevong, Chutipa
Titel	A Development of Systematic Learning Resources Management Process to Strengthen Sufficiency Attributes of Secondary School Students
Quelle	In: International Education Studies, 11 (2018) 12, S.42-48 (7 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1913-9020
Schlagwörter	Secondary School Students; Grade 7; Grade 8; Grade 9; Foreign Countries; Knowledge Management; Parents; Boards of Education; Secondary School Teachers; Educational Resources; Thailand + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Sekundarschüler; School year 07; 7. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 07; School year 08; 8. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 08; School year 09; 9. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 09; Ausland; Wissensmanagement; Eltern; Ausschuss; Bildungsmittel
Abstract	The research objective was to develop and evaluate systematic learning resources management process in inputs, process, outputs, outcome, and feedback of Nong Kung Wittayakarn School in Thailand. Research participants and key informants were 5 Grade 7-9 teachers, 34 Grade 7-9 students, 34 student parents, and 9 school board members totaling 82 people. Research tools were survey form, semi-structured interview form, learning resources evaluation form, sufficiency-oriented life satisfaction evaluation form, and meeting record form. The data analysis employed frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation statistics and content analysis. Research findings reveal that systematic learning resources management process to strengthen sufficiency attributes of secondary school students comprises (1) Inputs--internal staff, external people, and supporting budget; (2) Process--Define, Create, Capture, Share, and Use; (3) Outputs--overall learning resources evaluation had 3.33 average from the 4-point scale with people at highest level followed in descending order by economic, societal, environmental and cultural domains; (4) Outcome--overall and detailed sufficiency-oriented life satisfaction evaluation are at high level with psychological dimension at the highest score followed in descending order by well-being sustainability--self-reliance, immunity, and resilience; and (5) Feedback with reflection cycle--before action review (BAR), during action review (DAR), and after action review (AAR). The evaluation of the process reveals that the participants' acceptance is at highest level. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Canadian Center of Science and Education. 1120 Finch Avenue West Suite 701-309, Toronto, ON M3J 3H7, Canada. Tel: 416-642-2606 Ext 206; Fax: 416-642-2608; e-mail: ies@ccsenet.org; Web site: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01