Attribute-Level Item Selection Method for DCM-CAT

Autor/inn/en	Bao, Yu; Bradshaw, Laine
Titel	Attribute-Level Item Selection Method for DCM-CAT
Quelle	In: Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 16 (2018) 4, S.209-225 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1536-6367
DOI	10.1080/15366367.2018.1436824
Schlagwörter	Test Items; Selection; Adaptive Testing; Computer Assisted Testing; Classification; Test Length; Accuracy; Item Banks; Methods; Reliability + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Test content; Testaufgabe; Auslese; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Method; Methode; Reliabilität
Abstract	Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) can provide multidimensional diagnostic feedback about students' mastery levels of knowledge components or attributes. One advantage of using DCMs is the ability to accurately and reliably classify students into mastery levels with a relatively small number of items per attribute. Combining DCMs with computerized adaptive testing can further shorten a test by strategically administering different items to different examinees. Current studies about item selection methods select the next item to increase the classification accuracy for the overall attribute profile and have been explored with item pools that have equal attribute information for all attributes on the assessment. In practice, the attribute information for diagnostic assessment is usually not balanced in the item pool. We propose a new attribute-level item selection method based on Cognitive Diagnostic Index at the Attribute Level (CDI_A; Henson et al., 2008) that helps balance classification accuracies among attributes on an assessment when item pools are not balanced across attributes. We conducted simulation studies to compare the performance of the CDI_A to other leading item selection methods; a pair of studies was theoretically based, and the last study was empirically based. Results showed that the new method can increase the classification accuracy and the reliability for attributes with weaker items in the item pool by administering more items to measure the attribute. Although using fewer items, the method retains reasonable accuracies for the attributes with stronger items in the pool. Thus, the CDI_A provides a trade-off to maintain an acceptable level of estimation accuracy for all attributes. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01