"Appropriate" School Psychology Practice? You Be the Judge V

Autor/in	Zirkel, Perry A.
Titel	"Appropriate" School Psychology Practice? You Be the Judge V
Quelle	In: Communique, 44 (2015) 4, S.10 (4 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0164-775X
Schlagwörter	School Psychology; Legal Responsibility; School Psychologists; School Districts; Freedom of Speech; Dismissal (Personnel); Court Litigation; Constitutional Law; Disabilities; Federal Legislation; Civil Rights Legislation; Special Education; Illinois + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Schulpsychologie; Strafmündigkeit; School psychologist; Psychologists; School; Schools; Schulpsychologe; Schulpsychologin; Psychologe; Psychologin; Psychologen; Schule; School district; Schulbezirk; Redefreiheit; Dismissal; Entlassung; Rechtsstreit; Staatsrecht; Handicap; Behinderung; Bundesrecht; Private law; Bürgerliches Recht; Special needs education; Sonderpädagogik; Sonderschulwesen
Abstract	This fifth article in the series reviewing recent court decisions concerning appropriate school psychology practice from both professional and legal perspectives, asks readers to consider the summary of the Illinois case presented, and the questions and answers that follow. The primary issue is whether the school district's adverse employment action against the school psychologist was illegal. The primary issue of this case is whether the district's termination of the school school psychologist constituted retaliation under the First Amendment freedom of expression, which applies to public, not private institutions. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	National Association of School Psychologists. 4340 East West Highway Suite 402, Bethesda, MD 20814. Tel: 301-657-0270; Fax: 301-657-0275; e-mail: publications@naspweb.org; Web site: http://www.nasponline.org/publications/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01