Explanatory Typologies as a Nested Strategy of Inquiry: Combining Cross-Case and Within-Case Analyses

Autor/inn/en	Møller, Jørgen; Skaaning, Svend-Erik
Titel	Explanatory Typologies as a Nested Strategy of Inquiry: Combining Cross-Case and Within-Case Analyses
Quelle	In: Sociological Methods & Research, 46 (2017) 4, S.1018-1048 (31 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0049-1241
DOI	10.1177/0049124115613778
Schlagwörter	Classification; Case Studies; Evaluation Methods; Comparative Analysis; Social Science Research; Social Systems; Foreign Countries; History; United Kingdom; Sweden; Netherlands; France; Germany; Spain; Portugal; Italy; Poland; Hungary; Denmark; Norway; Belgium; Switzerland; Russia; Australia; Canada; New Zealand; United States; Chile; Greece; Uruguay; Argentina; Austria; Estonia; Latvia; Yugoslavia; Lithuania; China; Japan; India + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Social scientific research; Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung; Social system; Soziales System; Ausland; Geschichte; Geschichtsdarstellung; Großbritannien; Schweden; Niederlande; Frankreich; Deutschland; Spanien; Italien; Polen; Ungarn; Dänemark; Norwegen; Belgien; Schweiz; Russland; Australien; Kanada; Neuseeland; USA; Griechenland; Argentinien; Österreich; Estland; Lettland; Jugoslawien; Litauen; Indien
Abstract	Explanatory typologies have recently experienced a renaissance as a research strategy for constructing and assessing causal explanations. However, both the new methodological works on explanatory typologies and the way such typologies have been used in practice have been affected by two shortcomings. First, no elaborate procedures for assessing the general explanatory power of a typological theory on the cross-case level have been devised. Second, rigorous selection procedures for within-case analysis are lacking. Against this background, we introduce a systematic measure that helps researchers assess the explanatory power on the cross-case level, first, within the scope set by a particular typological theory and, second, by investigating the transferability of the theory beyond these scope conditions via an increase in the number of cases. Drawing on recent methodological works on nested analysis, we show how researchers can identify key cases for process tracing based on the cross-case explanatory fit of the typological theory. We illustrate the purchase of our procedures by revisiting seminal studies from the field of comparative historical analysis. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01