When "Safe" Means "Dangerous": A Corpus Investigation of Risk Communication in the Media

Autor/inn/en	Tang, Chris; Rundblad, Gabriella
Titel	When "Safe" Means "Dangerous": A Corpus Investigation of Risk Communication in the Media
Quelle	In: Applied Linguistics, 38 (2017) 5, S.666-687 (22 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0142-6001
DOI	10.1093/applin/amv058
Schlagwörter	Risk; Computational Linguistics; Applied Linguistics; Biochemistry; Water Quality; Health; Language Usage; News Reporting; Periodicals; Foreign Countries; Mass Media Role; Comparative Analysis; Web Sites; Public Health; Organizations (Groups); Qualitative Research; Probability; Safety; Discourse Analysis; Hazardous Materials; Cross Cultural Studies; Statistical Analysis; United Kingdom; United States + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Risiko; Linguistics; Computerlinguistik; Linguistik; Angewandte Linguistik; Biochemie; Wasserqualität; Gesundheit; Sprachgebrauch; News report; Reportage; Periodical; Journal; Zeitschrift; Fachzeitschrift; Periodikum; Ausland; Web-Design; Gesundheitswesen; Qualitative Forschung; Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung; Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie; Sicherheit; Diskursanalyse; Hazardous substance; Gefahrstoff; Cultural comparison; Kulturvergleich; Statistische Analyse; Großbritannien; USA
Abstract	The mass media has an important role in informing the general public about emerging health risks. Content-based studies of risk communication in the media have revealed a tendency to exaggerate risks or simplify science, but linguistic studies in this area are still scarce. This paper outlines a corpus based investigation of media reporting on the discovery of minute amounts of Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (EDCs) and Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in drinking water. There is no concrete evidence that these residuals pose any threat to human health in such minute amounts, but the natural scientific uncertainty and professional risk language surrounding contaminants have sparked considerable media attention in both the US and the UK. In fact, these have lead to Congress-level discussions about changes to the way contaminants are regulated in the US. Comparing media reports that appeared in newspaper articles, magazines and web-based media in the UK and the US with those to appear on water company and public health organisation websites, our use of quantitative and qualitative corpus linguistic techniques revealed strikingly different patterns for the language used to represent contaminants and their risks. While water organisation reports demonstrated a clear tendency to downplay the probability and severity of the risk posed by contaminants, the linguistic and rhetorical features identified in media texts place the focus on the potentiality of contaminants as an unconfirmed threat to public and environmental health. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of the media in the communication of health risks, and for communication about water contaminants. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Oxford University Press. Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, UK. Tel: +44-1865-353907; Fax: +44-1865-353485; e-mail: jnls.cust.serv@oxfordjournals.org; Web site: http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01