A Critique of Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model

Autor/inn/en	Reio, Thomas G., Jr.; Rocco, Tonette S.; Smith, Douglas H.; Chang, Elegance
Titel	A Critique of Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model
Quelle	In: New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 29 (2017) 2, S.35-53 (19 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1939-4225
DOI	10.1002/nha3.20178
Schlagwörter	Training; Program Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Models; Human Resources; Program Implementation; Use Studies + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausbildung; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Analogiemodell; Humankapital; Benutzerschulung
Abstract	Donald Kirkpatrick published a series of articles originating from his doctoral dissertation in the late 1950s describing a four-level training evaluation model. From its beginning, it was easily understood and became one of the most influential evaluation models impacting the field of HRD. While well received and popular, the Kirkpatrick model has been challenged and criticized by scholars, researchers, and practitioners, many of whom developed their models using Kirkpatrick's theoretical framework. This article reviews several evaluation models, and also presents empirical studies utilizing the four levels, collectively demonstrating the usefulness of, but the difficulty in, implementing all four levels. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01