Alternative Providers of Higher Education: What Are the Risks?

Autor/in	Evans, G. R.
Titel	Alternative Providers of Higher Education: What Are the Risks?
Quelle	In: Higher Education Review, 49 (2016) 1, S.5-25 (21 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0018-1609
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Higher Education; Educational Policy; Educational Change; Private Colleges; Nontraditional Education; Access to Education; Educational Quality; Competition; United Kingdom; United Kingdom (Scotland); United Kingdom (Wales); United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Bildungsreform; Privathochschule; Non-traditional education; Alternative Erziehung; Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Wettkampf; Großbritannien
Abstract	The part of the higher education sector in the United Kingdom in which providers are not publicly-funded (including for-profit, not-for-profit and charitable) has been expanding considerably under Government encouragement. This paper aims to clarify the practical and public policy issues now emerging, by tracing the history of the emergence of this policy in the wider context of trends in higher education policy in the United Kingdom, and with reference to the changes brought about by devolving higher education to the "devolved administrations" of Scotland and Wales. It examines the claims made by alternative provider lobbyists that they will be able to provide something for students which would be different and better. It looks at the mounting evidence, including the findings of the Quality Assurance Agency, the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee, that a number of alternative providers were guilty of bad practice and even fraud in taking advantage of the availability of Student Loan Company funding for their students. The penultimate section describes the attempt by a small group of alternative providers to form an organisation for leaders of the sector and to dissociate themselves from these trends and emerging problems. The article concludes with the implications of the White Paper, "Success as a Knowledge Economy," and the Higher Education and Research Bill, both published in May 2016 for the risks and implications of this significant proposed reconstruction of the system of United Kingdom higher education. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Tyrrell Burgess Associates. 34 Sandilands, Croydon, CRO 5DB, UK. Tel: +44-2086-561770; e-mail: subscriptions@highereducationreview.com; Web site: http://www.highereducationreview.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01