Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Thomas, Jason E.; Hornsey, Philip E. |
---|---|
Titel | Adding Rigor to Classroom Assessment Techniques for Non-Traditional Adult Programs: A Lifecycle Improvement Approach |
Quelle | In: Journal of Instructional Research, 3 (2014), S.27-37 (11 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2159-0281 |
Schlagwörter | Classroom Techniques; Nontraditional Education; Adult Education; Formative Evaluation; Evaluation Methods; Test Construction; Test Format; Design Preferences; Test Reliability; Test Validity; Higher Education Klassenführung; Non-traditional education; Alternative Erziehung; Adult; Adults; Education; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Testaufbau; Testentwicklung; Design requirements; Gestaltungsmittel; Testreliabilität; Testvalidität; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen |
Abstract | Formative Classroom Assessment Techniques (CAT) have been well-established instructional tools in higher education since their exposition in the late 1980s (Angelo & Cross, 1993). A large body of literature exists surrounding the strengths and weaknesses of formative CATs. Simpson-Beck (2011) suggested insufficient quantitative evidence exists on the utility of CATs for increasing the quality of student learning. Two quantitative studies by Simpson-Beck (2011) and Cottell and Harwood (1998) indicated no such correlation. We suggest that these deficiencies as applied to adult non-traditional programs may be due to a lack of rigor in the construction of many formative CATs, as well as a failure to properly match assessments to real learning objectives. In this article, we propose a nine-step framework to facilitate proper selection of formative CATs with appropriate rigor and implementation in the classroom. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Center for Innovation in Research and Teaching at Grand Canyon University. 3300 West Camelback Road, Phoenix, AZ 85017. Tel: 602-639-6729; e-mail: cirt@gcu.edu; Web site: http://www.instructionalresearch.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |