Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Adelstein, David; Barbour, Michael K. |
---|---|
Titel | Redesigning Design: Field Testing a Revised Design Rubric Based on iNACOL Quality Course Standards |
Quelle | In: International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 31 (2016) 2, (31 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 2292-8588 |
Schlagwörter | Instructional Design; Online Courses; National Standards; Elementary Secondary Education; Program Validation; Scoring Rubrics; Distance Education; Virtual Classrooms; Student Evaluation; Technology Integration; Course Evaluation; Interrater Reliability; Field Tests; Educational Quality; Likert Scales |
Abstract | Designers have a limited selection of K-12 online course creation standards to choose from that are not blocked behind proprietary or pay walls. For numerous institutions and states, the use of the iNACOL "National Standards for Quality Online Courses" is becoming a widely used resource. This article presents the final phase in a three-part study to test the validity and reliability of the iNACOL standards specifically to online course design. Phase three was a field test of the revised rubric based on the iNACOL standards against current K-12 online courses. While the results show a strong exact match percentage, there is more work to be done with the revised rubric. [Note: The volume number (32) displayed on the PDF is incorrect. The correct volume number is v31.] (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. 260 Dalhousie Street Suite 204, Ottawa, ON K1N 7E4, Canada. Tel: 613-241-0018; Fax: 613-241-0019; e-mail: journalofde@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |