Religion and Spirituality within Counselling/Clinical Psychology Training Programmes: A Systematic Review

Autor/in	Jafari, Simon
Titel	Religion and Spirituality within Counselling/Clinical Psychology Training Programmes: A Systematic Review
Quelle	In: British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 44 (2016) 3, S.257-267 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0306-9885
DOI	10.1080/03069885.2016.1153038
Schlagwörter	Counselor Training; Religion; Spiritual Development; Counseling Psychology; Clinical Psychology; Educational Research; Religious Factors; Higher Education; Literature Reviews; Search Strategies + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Counselling psychology; Beratungspsychologie; Klinische Psychologie; Bildungsforschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Suchstrategie
Abstract	In recent years, there have been increasing efforts to attend to religious and spiritual issues within clinical/counselling psychology. However, there is limited research demonstrating how successfully such content is integrated into existing training programmes. This investigation sought to review primary research literature related to training in religion and spirituality within accredited training programmes. Six studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria of this review and data were extracted for analysis using a thematic analytic technique. Five main themes were generated: training modalities, specialised training, systematic implementation, perception of religion and spirituality, and research support. Findings suggest that religious issues are being neglected within current programmes, although there is evidence that this is being reconciled through increasing levels of training. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01