A Comparison of Group-Oriented Contingencies for Addition Fluency

Autor/inn/en	Gross, Thomas J.; Duhon, Gary J.; Shutte, Greg; Rowland, Julie E.
Titel	A Comparison of Group-Oriented Contingencies for Addition Fluency
Quelle	In: Contemporary School Psychology, 20 (2016) 2, S.130-141 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2159-2020
DOI	10.1007/s40688-015-0054-x
Schlagwörter	Mathematics Instruction; Addition; Mathematical Concepts; Feedback (Response); Grade 1; Elementary School Mathematics; Elementary School Students; Contingency Management; Rewards; Performance; Group Activities; Mathematics Skills; Comparative Analysis; Teaching Methods; Time + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; School year 01; 1. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 01; Elementare Mathematik; Schulmathematik; Krisenbewältigung; Reward; Belohnung; Achievement; Leistung; Gruppenaktivität; Mathmatics achievement; Mathematics ability; Mathematische Kompetenz; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Zeit
Abstract	Math fact fluency is critical for understanding complex mathematics. Explicit timing interventions have shown promise for improving math fluency, and they may benefit from being paired with group-oriented contingencies. Further, investigations of independent and dependent group-oriented contingencies would help to identify their relative advantages. This study compared the effect of group contingency variations of an explicit timing intervention with goal setting and graphic feedback. Independent and dependent group-oriented contingency groups were compared along with an explicit timing only group. First-grade students completed daily addition probes and received graphs for the previous weeks' performance at the beginning of each week. Twice per week, the contingency groups received rewards based on their performance consistent with the contingency type. Results indicated that students in the independent group-oriented contingency condition had the greatest improvements in addition fluency. There was no difference found between the dependent and the explicit timing only group. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01