Emancipation, Marketisation, and Social Protection: The Female Subject within Vocational Training Policy in Canada, 1960-1990

Autor/in	Pullman, Ashley
Titel	Emancipation, Marketisation, and Social Protection: The Female Subject within Vocational Training Policy in Canada, 1960-1990
Quelle	In: Gender and Education, 27 (2015) 7, S.759-775 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0954-0253
DOI	10.1080/09540253.2015.1103840
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Higher Education; Educational Policy; Public Policy; Educational History; Vocational Education; Adult Education; Government Role; Equal Education; Job Skills; Gender Differences; Gender Bias; Training; Employers; Labor Market; Political Issues; Social Problems; Commercialization; Labor Force; Females; Job Training; Economic Factors; Canada + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Öffentliche Ordnung; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Ausbildung; Berufsbildung; Adult; Adults; Education; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Produktive Fertigkeit; Geschlechterkonflikt; Geschlechterstereotyp; Labour market; Arbeitsmarkt; Politischer Faktor; Social problem; Soziales Problem; Labour force; Arbeitskraft; Erwerbsbevölkerung; Weibliches Geschlecht; Berufsqualifizierender Bildungsgang; Ökonomischer Faktor; Kanada
Abstract	This paper examines Canadian federal and cross-provincial higher education policy from 1960 to 1990, a critical time when provisions for vocational and adult training came under the auspices of governmental concern, justified under both an economic rationale and as a way to address persistent forms of inequality. The problematisation of skill during this period had particular gendered implications, as addressing inequality through education subsidies intersected with the perceived training needs of employers and the market. Employing Nancy Fraser's theory of a "triple movement", the following paper "takes stock" of how the three political forces of social movements, marketisation, and social protection have shaped gendered discourses of education and training, the implications for which are of continued relevance to those trying to understand the education and training within the contemporary neo-liberal state. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01